 |
|  |  |  | Cincinnati students' success: Community got involved, and holistic 'cradle to career' approach made a difference MinnPost.com | By: Dane Smith April 24, 2011
We've all heard the stories and seen the movies about that charismatic
principal or that inspirational teacher who defied expectations and
boosted educational outcomes for a challenging group of students in a
tough urban environment.
Policy wonks have a phrase — "bringing
it to scale" — to describe the efforts to replicate that kind of
success story from a single school or classroom across an entire city,
or metropolitan region, or state or nation.
A slight but
definite increase in national high-school graduation rates across the
nation over the last decade suggests that those broader success stories
are out there. And one of the more compelling is provided by
Cincinnati, a river city and the urban core of a metropolitan area in a
Midwestern state, comparable in some ways to the Twin Cities and
Minnesota.
Graduation rates on average across the Cincinnati Public Schools
district increased from 51 percent in 2000 to 80 percent in 2009. And
the graduation rate differential between African-American students and
white students not only narrowed to nearly equal standing in that time
but has remained at similar levels since 2006.
College enrollment and readiness have gone up
Achievement
scores for the district improved significantly on the state of Ohio's
performance index, which is used to gauge academic proficiency for
school districts and schools. And perhaps most important, college
enrollment and readiness have bumped up, too: Colleges in the
Cincinnati area are reporting that more of the city's high-school
graduates are enrolling, and more students from the local area are
entering academia prepared for the challenges — and staying in college.
How
did Cincinnati do it? The Cincinnati story by all accounts truly was a
group effort, and the outstanding lesson is that there isn't really one
heroic Geoffrey Canada or Michelle Rhee who emerges as the Superman or
Superwoman of the experience. Cincinnati's success involved multiple
interventions along the entire pathway, from cradle to career launch,
not just one or two "silver bullets," such as lower class sizes,
aggressive testing, or assigning pass/fail grades to schools.
The
contributing factors, rather, included more attention to teaching teams
in the schools, student-based budgeting, more autonomy at the school
level, and closer working relationships between students and teachers.
Small, specialized schools
Failing
neighborhood high schools were converted into several small,
specialized schools, and students now can choose from all the high
schools in the district. The district also adopted a more equitable
method for funding and employed a student-based budgeting model in
which money follows the students, allowing schools more flexibility in
deciding how the money is spent. Additionally, students who cost more
to educate — English language learners, low-income students and gifted
students, for example — are supported with more funding. High schools
in Cincinnati also now boast strong programs in STEM (science,
technology, engineering and math), performing arts, liberal arts and
information technology. And once-failing public schools, such as Taft
Technology High and Withrow University High, are starting to catch the
attention of the national media.
But one overriding lesson is
that the school district was not alone in its efforts to reform schools
and improve achievement for all students. The local business and
philanthropic community, parents and community groups, teachers unions
and even national experts on school change (including Minnesota's own
Joe Nathan, director of the Center for School Change at Macalester
College) all played key roles.
The Cincinnati lesson is relevant
for the Twin Cities and Minnesota because it clearly shows that major
district-wide gains are possible for all students — including students
of color. The dramatic increases in graduation rates and the
elimination of the graduation gap came during a period when graduation
requirements actually increased in difficulty.
Building on success
Cincinnati
is of interest, too, because some are looking at cooperative efforts
there as a possible model for Minnesota schools. In 2006, an
organization called Strive Together
was founded to bring together key players and organizations to help
continue success in Cincinnati and expand that success metro-wide into
suburban communities in southern Ohio and northern Kentucky. Strive has
pursued a cradle-to-career approach — emphasizing education from early
childhood through to college and on to a career — and has spawned a
national network.
Two of the top leaders of Strive, State
University of New York Chancellor Nancy L. Zimpher and Strive President
Jeff Edmondson, met with education and community leaders from the Twin
Cities in February to promote the launch of a similar effort in our own
river cities. The event was arranged and sponsored by the African American Leadership Forum and the University of Minnesota's College Readiness Consortium.
Edmondson
summed up the effort this way: "We have talked with over 50 cities
across the country about this work. In every case, we have seen that it
takes a core group of committed leaders from across sectors to step up
and commit to working together over the long term, so we stop looking
for the silver bullet and begin building on what works in their
community to support every child from cradle to career."
And
Zimpher argued that "the Twin Cities is in need of the kind of
collaborative, systematic reform the Strive model offers, to ensure
that today's youth get the foundation they need to be successful."
Cincinnati
might not be the only model for our region and our state to develop a
strategy for increasing higher education attainment and closing the
racial and income gaps in achievement. But this all-encompassing
formula, and the emphasis on efforts that enlist everyone in the
community, show great promise for achieving the big gains that we'll
need for a broader prosperity.
Dane Smith is the president of Growth & Justice,
a policy research group based in St. Paul. Assistance with the research
and writing for this commentary was provided by Growth & Justice
research intern Amelia Cruver. A version of this column appeared in the
St. Paul Legal Ledger Capitol Report.
|  |
| |  |