 Between the Lines Sentinel Times | By: Tom Merchant March 30, 2011
WESTBROOK, Minnesota (STPNS) -- Last week I received an op-ed piece
from the MinnPost.com written by Nancy Maeker and Dane Smith.
It
talks about the growing disparity between the rich and the poor. It
goes on to state; the rich are indeed getting richer and the poor are
indeed getting poorer. The top one percent of us on the income ladder
are benefiting from unprecedented share of income and wealth, while
enjoying historically low federal and state tax rates despite chronic
budget shortfalls.
The sad truth is those of us stuck on the bottom or near the bottom of
the ladder are officially impoverished, and are once again the targets
for all the budget cuts at the federal and state level.
Poverty
trends over the past ten years for Minnesota are embarrassing to say
the least. Recent recessions, while inconvenient for wealthy investors
(most which have already recovered) have been devastating for many
Minnesotans who lost jobs, or benefits, or got swindled by unscrupulous
mortgagers and lost their home and life savings.
Our poverty
rate has dropped us out of the best ten states with the lowest
percentage of people living in poverty. Only four states have had a
higher poverty rate over the past ten years. Only Mississippi, Georgia,
and South Dakota got poorer faster! In one year from 2008 to 2009 we
added 57,000 people to the official poverty ranks leaving 563,000
Minnesotans or about 11 percent of our population in that category.
Maker
and Smith say in 2011, the top 10 percent of households are projected
to have about 45 percent of the state’s total income, while the bottom
10 percent will have less than 1 percent of income. Thus, if the bottom
ten percent could double its share of income, the other 90 percent
would only lose 1 percentage point of its share of the total personal
income.
They go on to say while our state and federal
governments are not solely responsible for alleviating poverty, they
must play a stronger role providing a modernized education system, and
the best work force in the world.
They need to restore work as a pathway out of poverty.
Help Minnesotans build and maintain financial assets.
Refocus and redesign public assistance.
I
feel overall, this is not the time to be slashing programs that help
people work their way out of poverty. It is a proven fact, children who
grow up in poverty will be much more challenged in finding their way
out of poverty. Students that go to school hungry have a difficult time
concentrating on their studies. Children living in broken families also
face challenges in school. Children who are homeless face even greater
challenges, from hunger to negative peer pressure.
There
is plenty of wealth in this country, for all people to live and
prosper. But until we solve the growing problem of poverty, we will
always have to deal with it at great expense to our society.
I
was reading the Declaration of Independence, and it states: We hold
these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that
among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I
think most people are familiar with that sentence. However I wonder how
many people are familiar with the last sentence in the Declaration? It
states: And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance
on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each
other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.
Nancy
Maeker is a Lutheran Pastor and executive director of A Minnesota
Without Poverty. Dane Smith is the president of Growth & Justice.
Have a great week!
|  |
| |